Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | azernik's commentslogin

That is an article saying that mesh networking frameworks exist. It does not support the GP claim of smart TVs creating mesh networks across different owners.

Did you read the article, or just the headline?

I just read the headline. Why should I read the article when the headline is so misleading.

> I just read the headline. Why should I read the article when the headline is so misleading.

Because the article explains the origins of the saints as Christianity coopting the story of the Buddha. The headline isn't wrong or misleading, you just made yourself look foolish by embracing ignorance.

>> Individual Western historians have noted the similarities between the story of Barlaam and Josaphat and the story of the Buddha for centuries – for example, it’s mentioned in an early printed edition of Marco Polo’s travels from 1446. But it was only in the mid-19th century that the saints’ tale was generally acknowledged as being derived from the Buddha’s.


Being much closer to the receiver and tied into terrestrial power grids, ground-based beacons can transmit at higher powers than GNSS signals and be received at much higher powers.

Received GNSS power is on the order of -130dBm (10e-16 W) - you can jam that with a 1W terrestrial source for hundreds of meters around. Way more if you're willing to scale the power from car USB power levels to bigger grid-connected supplies.

LORAN, from my quick googling, looks to be about 6-7 orders of magnitude higher received power.


He's always been pragmatic - it's just that Nvidia's behavior has AFAICT actually changed.

The original you're riffing on is from the Declaration of Independence (a purely rhetorical document), not the Constitution of a decade later.


No knowledge (insider or otherwise) is needed — could just be a bet, hedged against all the other bets a company AMD's size makes.


It's about propping up the yen in foreign exchange terms, so the essential operation is buying yen with dollars to increase the price of the former in a standard microeconomics way.

US bonds happen to be the assumed-safe sink where central banks store their dollars for this eventuality.


That's the license they sign with you, ie the legal commitment they make and powers they reserve.

Policy is the internal, non-binding decision they make about how they exercise those powers, which GP comment accurately described.


Your second paragraph describes the approach in the blog post almost exactly.


The recruiters who make these boneheaded mistakes are typically organizationally separate from the actual engineering group you'd be working in.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: