Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chaserelock's commentslogin

They created 1.5B BAT

"- Once a month, they will split the BATs I earned accordingly by each website I visited(is there proof this happens?);"

Right now if a website is not Brave verified, that donation intent just sits in local storage and re-attempts itself for some period of time.

Brave makes money by being the ad regulator and distributor. If a publisher spends X on ad spend, users get 0.7x distributed back and Brave keeps the delta.

Advertisers can pay in BAT or just send Brave fiat and they'll purchase BAT on the open market as shown here: https://brave.com/transparency/.

(Not affiliated with Brave/BAT, just a satisfied Brave user)


Thank you for clarifying that.

What about withdrawing rewards? Is Uphold still the only option? And is it safe?


Gemini is coming up, creators already can use it (this gets NY state service) and users to follow. Also bitFlyer for Japan.


What about European users? Will there be any trouble withdrawing funds? I'm for Portugal, if that helps somehow.


Uphold already covers Portugal.


Thanks!


Pared | San Francisco, CA | ONSITE | Full time

We're looking for a Director of Engineering to join us in our downtown SF office (near Montgomery BART). https://jobs.lever.co/pared/cc84ff67-f026-4258-8513-2e61e5e5...

We’re building a platform and network in the hospitality industry, connecting understaffed restaurants with hospitality professionals looking for opportunities to grow their skills and make money. Pared works with thousands of restaurants in multiple markets including some of the best chefs in the world including: Thomas Keller, Jean-Georges Vongerichten, Dominique Crenn and many more. We have over 100,000 hospitality professionals signed up on the platform and growing every day. We are rapidly expanding to new markets and helping more restaurateurs and hospitality professionals with the mission of making restaurant life easier and are looking for great people to join the Pared team. Read more about us in our feature in The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/01/business/restaurant-jobs-...

Love to answer any questions!


One small note is that independent vectors are ALWAYS orthogonal in their space. That's by definition of linear independence. If they were not mutually orthogonal, then at minimum you could remove 1 vector from the set and still have the same space representation.


[1, 0] and [1, 1] are linearly independent but not mutually orthogonal. Unless I am understanding what you mean by "in their space".


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: