Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cheebla's commentslogin

Anyone have any insight on what they're gonna spend it on?

I don't know anything about valuations but why would a company like Pinterest need 100 million dollars cash?


Just to be clear, when he says "nonfree" he means free as in speech, not free as in beer, right?


yes, you can basically always assume that with stallman


Money is the great equalizer. I don't imagine they'll have any trouble getting start-ups to take their money. Then again, 65 million seems like a lot of money but if these guys don't know what they're doing it won't last them very long.


That initial 65 million in equity is worth easily 3x that much now, even more post-IPO


I'm sure they can get their dad and his buddies to invest in their fund.


does Kickstarter post stats on these kind of things? Like what percentage of funded projects are delivered?

if not, why not?


probably because its not beneficial for them to publish these stats, but I would love to see these statistics.


Actually, found the blog article: it's 46% in 2011 (43% in 2010), but whatever: http://www.kickstarter.com/blog/2011-the-stats


That's actually just the percentage of projects that hit their funding goal. There is no indication of what percentage delivered.

I suspect someone could figure this out. To my knowledge, all funded projects still have accessible pages. You could go through them all and see which have updates that indicate shipping...


Ahh, I believe you're correct. I optimistically read those stats...


they have a blog posting where they state something like 40% of all funded projects were delivered in 2011.


I'm confused as to how they got him to say "Coachella". Had he performed there in his lifetime or did they have to create that word from old voice recordings?


He died three years before the first Coachella. So no, he had never performed there.


I'm pretty sure with enough voice data you can make people say just about anything, and Tupac left behind a ton of voice data.


Yep. See the work of cassetteboy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m2pFYYEiko (NSFW language)

All they use is soundforge, and it's trivial. You can achieve perfect results with modern software and algorithmic assistance.


Wouldn't it be easier to just hire a voice actor or impersonator?


They did use a voice impersonator.


source?


It would be easier to just sit at home and listen to an old Tupac album also.


I'm going to guess something like C - (r)oach - (f)ella.


I'm not sure if this is what you're suggesting, but I can't imagine we will ever see someone producing entirely new Tupac songs based on his phoneme library.

It would be in such bad taste that even the American recording industry wouldn't go near it. People already get upset that they use old entire recordings to produce new songs, and those are actually his lyrics and his voice.


On a much smaller scale, this has already been done. Tupac's posthumous "Loyal to the Game" album produced by Eminem had a number of lyrical phrases constructed out of phonemes.

There was a small amount of outrage at the time of its release, but it mostly focused on the fact that those constructed lyrics were endorsing other rappers (mostly Eminem's protégés also performing on the track), whom some fans felt Tupac would not have endorsed had he been alive.


Definitely, but I think it is a question of scale.

It's one thing to construct some ad-libs, but to actually create a piece of art (i.e. an entire verse) is a whole different ball game. It would be like if someone took fragments of Picasso paintings, constructed an entirely new painting, and called it a Picasso.

I suppose it's conceivable that someone might try to do it, and it's apparently technically possible, but I think it would be roundly rejected.


There are some interesting painting remix projects, by the way: http://www.studiovoltaire.org/edition-arcangel.htm


It would be in such bad taste that even the American recording industry wouldn't go near it.

Oh, I'd take that bet. I would even bet that the producers will claim to have been in touch with his spirit.


> bad taste that even the American recording industry wouldn't go near it

What in hell makes you believes the recording industry has good taste?


To paraphrase the well-known maxim, you can never go broke underestimating the good taste of the american public (over a long enough timeframe). The IP status of the voice is a really fascinating question though, given how complex the current songwriting/master/recording breakdown is already.


> you can never go broke underestimating the good taste of the american public

Is bear-baiting coming back, then?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: