Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fm100's commentslogin

What are the differences between TEN VAD and WebRTC VAD?


In general, WebRTC VAD uses pitch information for VAD. Note that pitch only appears in voiced speech, but not in unvoiced speech. With this characteristic, WebRTC VAD may fails in detecting the start of a word, losing the unvoiced start, which will then result in e.g. increased WER in ASR system. On the other hand, noise whose spectrum is similar to voiced speech, e.g. music, may be extracted a non-zero pitch by WebRTC VAD pitch detection system.

Our model incorporates fbank and the pitch information together, and can analyse the input pattern deeply, therefore has better performance than WebRTC VAD.


What are the differences between TEN VAD and Silero VAD?


What advantages do you offer? How do you compare with similar projects?


TEN is good at real-time, multimodal, multi programming languages and cloud-edge. I doubt they are.


Why do you guys implement tensor data type instead of integrating colbert directly?


Because colbert is not an end-to-end solution. As seen for RAGatouille, it has integrated colbertv2 into this repo. However, it's not a database, we implement tensor within infinity, aim to make an end-to-end solution for late interaction based ranking models.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: