Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nitinreddy88's commentslogin

A project without screenshots - I dont know how they expect us to understand unless we read everything

Yeah, the README doesn't have screenshots; but the docs site does - https://godot-pty.github.io/gpty/ - 1 for now, but each release's blog entry gets the main app page + one for any salient features.

I'll add that in; maybe defaulted to folded on the README, a gallery of app screens or snippets. I need to spend some time on the UX, but yeah, screenshots (and possibly some sort of an intro video that explains features) is something I should've also added to the README.


Actually no windows doesn't even pass Passenger Flight rules and regulations. In Asia, its mandatory that windows should be opened, visible during takeoff and landing.


Doesn’t that technically only mean that all windows that exist need to be open, and having no windows at all would satisfy the requirement “all windows are open”? Or is the second sentence an addition to the first?


20k (30$) for font for someone living in India is too much to ask.


It looks like they do pricing parity for different countries. Being in South Africa it shows a 40% discount available.


They are adopting to containerd standard, not sure why negative sentiment


Where did you see that? I just did a deep dive into podman/quadlets/bootc/composefs and never once seen a mention of that. A google search also didn’t bring anything like that up.


I think the "They" mentioned was Docker, not Podman. That Docker was adopting the containerd standard.


Jup that’s definitely it, not sure how I got it that wrong.


It's not just you. I interpreted it similarly


You forgot to add /s!

As a foreigner, It would be near impossible for one company to ask every govt in that world to make this happen (with current political weather conditions).

HN people will always find someway to connect this to their most hated companies (be it Meta, Google, Microsoft)


That might be because the biggest tech companies have the most skin in the game where legislation is concerned. Money and lobbying is essential if you want the market share and the market hold that they have. Doesn’t matter their political stance towards the US anymore when they companies are willing to compromise and host data centers within any govt’s jurisidction.



Meta is definitely lobbying in Canada, I don't know why you think this is so far fetched.

Near impossible? No, meta is frequently making themselves part of conversation on various regulations in the country.


You might want to add /s tag to it.


This isn't Reddit.


No worries, the team Literal is alive and well on HN..


You are fine with it. But may be rest of the world is not. Anyway, to compare performance/benchmark, we need metrics and this is one of the basic metric to measure.


Any reason why it doesn't support Codex? I believe the idea and implementation seems to be pretty much agent independent


Essentially they want you to use it for 6 months and then hook you up to their paid offerings. Smart


According to your analogy. Certified pilot = Certified driving license holder. Its not like Tesla is advertising non driving license or in eligible person can drive using Autopilot. I wonder how can you even justify your statement


Autopilot is part of a private pilots license and systems are approved by the FAA. Tesla autopilot isn't part of a driving license, nor did it undergo review by the NHTSA prior to launch because Elon considered it "legal by default".


No. You don't need to know the autopilot to get your PPL. You do however need to know how to follow the POH (pilot operating handbook, which may include manufacturer guidelines for the autopilot) and perform basic instrument flying in an emergency. I don't recall any significant expectations of autopilot usage at the PPL level though.


The trend is to include as much as the aircraft’s capabilities in the checkride now.

For an IFR checkride, if you do it in an aircraft equipped with autopilot, at least one approach will have to be flown with the autopilot.

Not sure if that’s made it’s way to the PPL checkride (or been codified) but it’s inevitable.


> if you do it in an aircraft equipped with autopilot

There's also a (stupid, imo) tendency for APs to conveniently become inop right before a checkride. It's not accurate to say that all pilots, or even all pilots that have taken an IR ride, are "pilots who understand the capabilities and limits of aviation autopilot technology."


For the PPL specifically, the focus is on basic airmanship in VFR conditions, and that means eyeballing the six pack (or digital equivalent) and looking out of the window. The instrument flying expectations is primarily for emergencies and preparation for future instrument rating.

But yes, I understand what you mean.


I'm not sure it's been codified, but I was told I would need to understand how to use the VOR and autopilot if the plane I was in had one.

In the fleet at the school I was learning in (Cessna 162) only one plane had an autopilot, which meant nobody practiced with it, so they never scheduled this plane for a check ride.


“Full Self Driving”


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: