I build a governed infrastructure for internal tools and AI agents: https://rootcx.com

Everybody uses Claude Code or AI coding tools to build internal software, but they lack the governed infrastructure layer required for enterprise trust. RootCX provides that missing foundation. We offer the security, auditability, hosting and permissioning primitives necessary to move internal software from "cool demo" to prod

vs rootcx (https://rootcx.com) :D

The return of Arc browser?

I'm working on RootCX (https://github.com/RootCX/RootCX), a platform for building and shipping internal apps and AI agents in production.

Think of it like "Claude code on Supabase", but for internal apps and AI agents.

I got tired of choosing the deployment platform, wiring up Postgres, SSO (OIDC), RBAC, audit logs, secret vaults, integrations/tools/MCP, ... from scratch every time I needed an internal tool.

Nice launch! It reminds me a lot RootCX (https://github.com/RootCX/RootCX)

toxic.

This is how you gift wrap the agentic era to the open source chinese LLMs. devs don't need the best model, they need one without lawyers attached.

introducing moderation, steerage and censorship in your LLM is a great way to not even show up to the table with a competitive product. builders have woken up to this reality and are demanding local models

the real insight here isn't that sizing is broken. Everyone knows that. It's that fixing it would require brands to admit their current customers don't match the label they've been selling them. "You're not a size 6, but size 10" is bad for business

So invent new names

Including 999 using Copilot.