> Use of diversion and "restorative justice" programs, which clearly do not work for certain classes of criminals with very long rap sheets, but here we are.
But they clearly work on others, so they’re probably fine.
> Not enough (LE|DA|jail) funding or staffing or space
This is a solvable problem if you’re willing to pay taxes on it. I think it’s a good thing because newer facilities and more staff probably leads to more humane treatment of prone in jail. We could also stop routinely jailing people who are awaiting trial, too.
A lot of utility companies including Comcast used to not have a flow for “moving” and so you’d get a brand new account with a comcast email every time you moved to a new address. In a lot of cases the techs would just set it up for you as part of the install and give you the password. It’s only in the last 10 years they added anything like that. I have 3 or 4 different obsolete accounts with them where my actual email is the contact email from that time and some of their online systems will reset the wrong password and stuff like that.
This is too simplistic. A lot of automatic door locks are just door strikes with a solenoid that is remotely actuated inside the door casing. In that model you can let people out of the building because the inner part of the door has a bar you can press that moves the door pin, which is how all door handles work normally, so there’s no “fail open” needed. You can get out, but you might not be able to get back in.
The pump manufacturer is at fault a few different ways. They have a responsibility to make pumps that don’t break, and they should probably issue a recall. They shouldn’t rely on the availability of a product they don’t supply as a backup unless they can guarantee somehow that the patient always has access. Their staff should ask where you want the thing shipped to and include options like receiving the replacement at a Fedex or UPS location. Their staff should be trained to ask “are you traveling or otherwise away from your home address?” And finally they should train staff on follow-up questions for a patient’s plan and confirm the patient has enough insulin on-hand to cover executing the plan.
Hah, "make pumps that don't break". Well, when you figure out how to keep entropy at bay, please tell us, because that would be a cool trick. Pumps will break. It's genuinely amazing that the author went twenty-five years before experiencing her first broken pump.
The author screwed up. "I'm not at home and need you to send the new pump to my hotel." Problem solved. Yes, the customer service rep should have pro-actively offered to do that, but c'mon. That is a super basic thing to request, and people need to advocate for themselves. And that's not even "advocacy" in any difficult sense; it's a basic request that the company should have had no problem complying with. If they did refuse to send it to where the author was, then that would be grounds for an angry blog post.
On top of that, the author, clearly a functioning adult human, seems to have never had the imagination to ask herself, "what happens if my pump breaks; what is my backup plan?" Hell, that's an important question to have an answer for when you're at home, not just when away on a trip. Based on her words in this blog post, she clearly absolutely knows that this device is critical for maintaining her life. Devices break sometimes. You need a backup. Preferably two backups, for something as critical as this. This is just basic common sense.
Why is any of that their responsibility? Their staff did ask if they would be fine without the new pump and op said yes. They were fine. They could have gone to a hospital. They could have gone to Walmart and bought some insulin syringes for their supply
Yes for men mostly it’s red/green colorblindness. It’s one reason traffic lights have a uniform order and why you might get tested on which light means stop and not what color on a written test in the US.
Because what parents have access to now is extremely ineffective unless they prevent their kids from going outside or going to school. Right now the onus is entirely on parents too keep their kids off the Internet equivalent of smoking cigarettes, and it’s a losing battle. What we’re looking for is for the liability to shift off the parent and onto the people intentionally communicating with children. Frankly the proposal above was very reasonable. If you don’t want to intentionally communicate with kids then do nothing and you have no liability.
I want to intentionally communicate with kids, because kids have always been valued members of the online communities I frequent. Right now, it is easy for social media giants to exploit children, easy for child predators to get access to abuse children, and increasingly-difficult to maintain online spaces in which children are allowed to safely exist. That is surely not what we are intending to accomplish, here.
Look man there are several different ways people argue and calling someone a liar or saying a policy is cruel despite the official line is entirely reasonable. If you’re taking that so personally that you have to personally respond to everyone about that then I have to wonder if you’re just trying to defend the policy in a motte and then retreat to the bailey of “I don’t support the policy I just don’t like how you’re arguing.” Calling someone cruel or a liar is not a slur, they’re calling out what they view as shameful acts. I think it’s within the bounds of civility to call someone cruel or a liar. I really think you’re just trolling with repeated requests for civility here.
Correct. On its own, calling someone a liar is not an argument. However, if a person is a liar, that fact provides useful context in evaluating statements made by that person. Traditionally, when a person has been shown to lie repeatedly, one should expect them to continue lying, and therefore one should not take their statements at face value. Can you understand how that is relevant in this case?
But they clearly work on others, so they’re probably fine.
> Not enough (LE|DA|jail) funding or staffing or space
This is a solvable problem if you’re willing to pay taxes on it. I think it’s a good thing because newer facilities and more staff probably leads to more humane treatment of prone in jail. We could also stop routinely jailing people who are awaiting trial, too.
reply