Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | throwaway98797's commentslogin

most jobs don’t require deep thought.

in LLM terms low to no reasoning is better than ultra.


it encourages back and forth.

it trains people to expect things.

boundaries.


it’s passive aggressive.

ultimately it’s better to not inform and start ignoring these people.

let natural selection work.


Natural selection is demonstrably not working. It only takes one look at a newspaper to see that thoughtlessness and stupidity are doing better than ever.

I think the internet is pretty great, but it's a major factor in that rise in at least 3 ways:

* Previously, an important check on fools was social consequences. Now they have an endless supply of people to bother. Spammers were the first to exploit that, but now it's endemic.

* Algorithmic weighting toward the reaction-generating (versus, say thoughtful, measured, responsible, accurate, helpful, kind) has rewarded idiocy and awfulness with attention and money. We're all now living in a reality TV show.

* As those behaviors become a major percentage of what people, especially young people, see, they become normalized. Otherwise people think being a thoughtless jackass is just how to get by in the world.

We are strongly in need of firm politeness, of militant decency. Without it, things will get "naturally" worse.


Natural selection selects for reproductive fitness, not intelligence.


I believe he's using it metaphorically here, and thus so am I.


People forget this far too often.


What I wrote was neither passive nor aggressive. My telling you now that I think your response was ill-considered is also not passive aggressive, though it's arguably aggressive.


this maybe a me issue

any kind of softness in language like “i’ll-considered” sounds so sterile that i sense hatred underneath. too much time in big companies.

more sharing a crazy person take on how different words can be interpreted counter to the intent.


I do not hate you :) I think you will probably have more positive interactions on the internet if you choose a different register to communicate in but I promise I do not actually care


ha! i like the negativity since the anonymous thing frees me to be me

i hate being civil!


Whats the worst that could happen if you read GP’s words in a positive bias? Best case you learn something, made a friend, amd trained yourself to look for useful feedback in the future. Worst case you improved your mood and moved on.

You’re in the prison of your own devise, the negative bias.


~salute-emoji~


What's passive about it?


Furthermore, what's aggressive about it?


don’t use ai when you write emails to me.

that’s direct and aggressive.

framing it as advice is the passive part.


Yeah, I have started ignoring AI generated stuff.


Directly telling someone that you have a problem with something they did and why you think it's a problem is not "passive aggressive" by any stretch of the definition.


Mindlessly calling things passive aggressive, is nearly as bad as pasting AI slop. Start working on your language skills.

And yes, this comment is passive aggressive.

See the difference?


oh, the irony!


Why is it passive aggressive?


when people write me ai slop.

i either ignore. or if i trust them i just say “don’t use ai slop”.

anything softer is passive and morally judgy too.

i’m not here to tell them what’s globally right, only how i want them to interact with me.


Ignoring them is more passive aggressive than the answer he gave.


it’s not that it’s ai generated it’s that it’s bad.


politics, can’t have the government give a dime to the rich directly.


sometimes fraud leads to positive outcomes.

imagine a world where SBF didn’t defraud the crypto world.

in that world anthropic may have not existed.


What's The link there?


SBF was one of the earliest funders of Anthropic, Solana, Robinhood and Cursor, mostly around 2022.


Is there evidence that no one else would fund Anthropic, Solana, Robinhood and Cursor?


you are so wrong. this is not ai.


Parts of it seem not to be, but the bulk of it is. Here is a particularly clear example of opus-4.8-speak.

> Now, I want to be careful here, because this is the part where it would be very easy to start waving my arms around. Every single one of these has many causes. Suburbs and cars. Television, and then phones. A long list of things that have nothing to do with me at all. I am not going to claim I have found the one secret root of loneliness, and you should be suspicious of anyone who does. We cannot cleanly untangle these. That is just honestly true.


Watching trust in online content of any kind disintegrate in realtime due to AI in a forum that on balance breathlessly touts AI is surreal.


You're conflating different things here. You would have to look very hard on HN to find someone who "breathlessly touts" the idea of publishing AI-generated blogposts under your own name.


In for a penny, in for a pound. "Well it's ok when I do it" doesn't wash.


i wish i could codify voice.

probably someone has.

i’m not beyond being fooled, but when there’s voice there’s a human.

this is especially true with certain types of awkward phrasings that LLMs love to correct but humans don’t.

one day my internal filter will fail, but not today.


Right, this is cyborg text. The opening is in human voice. I am acknowledging that. Then it ebbs and flows over llm rocks.

The piece would be maybe 6-8 grafs without claude, and much of claude is papered over.


if something’s strategically important for safety it’s wise to have competency in it.


people use outlook when gmail exists.

employees will always suffer.


some employers may like this wishy washy answers.

personally i find this offensive and would disqualify the candidate.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: