Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That says more about their accuracy than the bunker strength. The allied bombing was terrible.


They dropped grand slam (22,000lb) bombs on submarine pens. Some of the hits are detailed on wikipedia, but yeah WW2 bombing wasn't accurate.

"It was the most powerful non-atomic aerial bomb used in combat until 2017"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Slam_(bomb)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentin_submarine_pens

"The Lancasters attacking Valentin each carried a single large earthquake bomb – seven carried the 5 ton 'Tallboy', thirteen carried the 10 ton 'Grand Slam'. Two 'Grand Slam's hit the target and penetrated about half-way through the 15-foot (4.6 m) thick ferrous concrete roof before exploding. The explosions blew large holes in the remaining thickness of the roof and brought down around 1,000 tons of debris into the chamber below.[8] Workers who were inside the bunker at the time survived, as the bombs did not penetrate the roof before detonating.[8]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U-Boat_Pen_Grand_Slammed....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bremen-Farge,_Royal_Air_F...


But with "as many as 500 high-explosive bombs and more than 60,000 incendiary bombs" you'd think they could have hit the bunker a few times?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: