Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ah efnet. That place was the wild west since they never adopted services. I remember channel takeovers and recoveries with extreme tactics like forcing netsplits with DOS attacks on the servers. Having to run an eggdrop bot to re-op people when they join a channel. Running your own bot to keep your nick from being stolen. Good times.


Your argument is invalid. Not the absence of services but rather the fact that back then you could crash a box by means of simply sending a single well crafted TCP packet to your adversary. It was adventure among the kids, and the "elders" did not really care plus no one in their right mind dared assaulting their source of knowledge. ( And shell accounts :P )


Wow more memories. Yes it was too easy to exploit the system for personal gain which was exactly the point of services. If someone managed to take over a channel, chanserv would immediately and automatically restore ownership. It's impossible to use someone else's handle when nickserv requires auth.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: