Nobody talked about usability or widespread adoption.
Article was targeted at people who are using PGP and urged them to stop using it without, offering a viable alternative and the parent comment called it out.
> Nobody talked about usability or widespread adoption
This directly contradicts the original comment.
> Article was targeted at people who are using PGP and urged them to stop using it without, offering a viable alternative and the parent comment called it out.
The article has an entire section explaining alternatives. The first link in the article [1], also written by the same author, has an even longer list of alternatives. It's hard to miss.
Article was targeted at people who are using PGP and urged them to stop using it without, offering a viable alternative and the parent comment called it out.