Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The real problem is not so much that they can do this, which is of course entirely legal...

Not "entirely" legal. All these companies claim to be neutral, and while I think they genuinely try to be, for various reasons they aren't able to stick to that standard.

The point of contracts is that you give up certain rights. On Monday, I can't sleep in all day because I've got an agreement to work. I have to set aside some money for rent because I signed a lease.

What these companies are doing may be legal in practice, because of the difficulties in litigating, but it's never entirely legal to make promises and then break them, whether they're through contracts, terms, or even marketing claims and advertisements.

When they make those claims, they voluntarily give up their right to say anything they like. Being able to give a right up is part of having it in the first place.

Twitter could change their terms to say, "we will ban or block people we have political differences with, or when bad PR is making us feel uncomfortable." Then banning people for those reasons would be 100% legal, because they would have reserved that right.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: