Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I bet applying to Y Combinator is an important enough process that barely needs a deadline reminder.


People (some people) deal very poorly with far future deadlines, where "far" ranges from "after this conversation is over" to "months from now." Middle class Americans are typically trained to be a little better at this than humans are born to, but at the end of the day you're running Well-Educated Professional 2011 on hardware designed to be minimally capable of executing SimianOS.

There's also a spectrum of, shall we say, commitment to one's application which is orthogonal to quality of the application. If I were to ever apply, that would be a Certified Big Deal for me personally, but for someone running a successful business, speaking to investors, and in the middle of hiring engineer #3, this might be just one more thing on the ToDo list. That doesn't necessarily make my business a better fit for YC than her's.


Actually, I'd bet that if there's one biggest thing that stands between me and pg giving me a big check it's my ability to set goals and meet them in a timely fashion.


Actually a surprising number of the best startups we've funded applied on a whim at the last minute. IIRC David Rusenko of Weebly applied in the last half hour without even having had time to tell his cofounders that he was.


I submitted my application a while ago, but I've updated it a few times to clarify things better as well updating it to reflect changes. What are the odds that the people reading it are going to have read one of the old versions or one of the better and newer versions? Thanks a ton.


I can't remember where I read this, but I believe one the partners has said it's unlikely they've looked at earlier versions of your application.


I wish PG would answer this one, because I'm thinking the same thing and would love some solid clarification.


Any version over about 3 days old would probably not have been graded. (We skim early applications, but we rarely vote on them.) Anything since then could have been.


Good to know, I have had an application in for a couple weeks and since then have made immense changes to it.

Thanks for the clarification.


Judging by the flood of last-day applications, in spite of PG's advice to apply early, a reminder is still needed: http://twitter.com/#!/paulg/status/123509842412445696


We always get about half the applications on the last day. It's not necessarily a sign of procrastination. A lot of these people have been working on their applications; they just haven't submitted them yet.


This is definitely the case for us. We started the application process earlier but have not submitted until the last hour. We've been updating answer by answer.


That's interesting. I wonder what the trade off is between submitting a possibly imperfect application early, vs. a polished-as-possble entry on the last day.


It depends on who submitted it. We submitted early, but have made small revisions every day, aside from two large revisions in the last day or two. I guess we were not too worried about it. If it's going to work, it's going to work.


Agreed, if it's going to work... it's going to work. We submitted our app a week or so ago and haven't looked back.


I'm not sure why you're getting downvoted. I thought the same thing.



File doesnt exist?

No file by this name exists. File links

No pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file. (Pages on other projects are not counted.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: