You know, I tried to hint at where your logic breaks down and be a little funny while at it, but you just don't get it. Let me be more direct.
1. It is most definitely not a small minority that would be excluded from high-paying jobs if these jobs are to go only to men, and only so they could use money to get women. You would have to exclude gay men, married men, men with girlfriends, and many more groups that when taken together, would comprise an overwhelming majority.
2. I really hope you take this next point the right way. If you genuinely believe that the formula of the sexual marketplace is money≈sex, you really need some introspection and perhaps a radically different environment - friends, reading material, TV shows, parents... whatever sources you are getting that information from. I am not trying to be glib. You are being misled, and you are the only person who will pay for it in the long term.
If you take my argument to a hyperbole, it is obviously not going to work. Men and women are not clones of each other. We have different values and different needs. Different challenges. According to those drives we act in the most efficient manner we can. Part biological, part cultural, part rational.
Sexual dimorphism exists. I have seen strong evidence for this.
The rules of sexual marketplace.
>Do you think it's equally as unimportant for ugly women? What about lesbians?
Both are a small minority. Ugly women still can't improve their attractiveness by having a job nearly as much as men can.