Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Almost all knowledge is now available for free. Just saying "could learn this for free" doesn't mean people will or should.

It's impossible to learn everything that could be useful. We have to prioritize.

In some cases, that means paying money for information we could get elsewhere.

At my consulting rate, I can buy this course in three hours (it's not technical consulting). Would I spend more than three hours of my time gathering all the information in this course? Most likely.

Therefore, I can actually save money by buying this course. And given that one additional sale of the product I'm using this for is worth the price of the course, it's information I am interested in.



I think we are agreeing - although I seem to be saying patio11 is a kick in the pants, and you saying he is an aggregator of knowledge. Either way yes, there is a price point to be found, 250 seems not unreasonable and I guess most importantly I would not worry patio11 is a shyster and so would be far more likely to buy than J.random course


Yeah, I agree it's a kick in the pants. I guess I'm saying that it's also more than merely a kick in the pants.


I kick in the pants, using a textbook tied to his foot?

I think analogy has been stretched past breaking point here.

Ok i'm going to have to launch something now just to try it out




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: