Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If Hollywood wants to make MORE money. Let me watch NEW movies at home.

Why at home?

1) Bathroom breaks

2) People's heads aren't in the way

3) No blurry screens

4) No crappy audio

5) Snacks I want

6) Quieter. No kids crying or cell phones, etc.

I am willing to spend the same price. I hate going to movie theater these days... I just wait for the DVD (or Bluray).



The problem with this is they can't enforce the amount of people watching. It could be just you or maybe you and 10 friends.


This is one of the reasons that Disney initially disliked the video business.

Disney have been involved in a number of weird IP protection stuff. They developed a cassette that could only be rewound with a special device. It was supposed to be a "watch once per payment" mechanism. They also developed a DVD that would oxidise slowly once it got contact with air. They'd burn a movie, seal it in a special case, and ship it to people. Once you opened the packet you'd get about 2 days to watch the movie.


There is a technical solution to that, for example one based on the patent mentioned here:

http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-patent-uses-kinect-...

EDIT: Hey, don't shoot the messenger.


Exactly what I want in my life. A way for companies to track me and my friends inside my own home.


Man, since when does a relevant link to a clever solution to a technical problem get downvoted on HN? Y'all need to get over it.


You could always have your friends hide behind a blanket to confuse the sensor.


I can see this backfiring pretty bad...


The future does not look promising.


Tough. They don't need a mechanism to enforce that no-one ever watches one of their films without paying them.


Why does it matter how many people watch? I guess I don't understand this logic.

I would pay $30 USD to watch a movie from my couch that is currently in the theaters. Maybe a couple friends are over (another couple) but that total is 4... not 40.

I would bet major releases would see people throwing parties at their homes. But then again, is it a problem? Maybe raise the price a bit?


It matters when comparing to cinema tickets. Let's say a ticket is normally $10 for the sake of a nice round number, and they charge $30 to get the film at home. If you want to watch on your own it's expensive, on the other hand if you have 3 friends over to watch with you then they have lost $10.

Obviously it's not quite that simple, as some of those 3 friends might not have gone to the cinema - but maybe they all would have.


Solution to this - evaluate your expenses and adjust price constantly. This way if it turned out that it is usually 10+ friends watching particular movie, charge for it 10x more. (but not 10x more what you want to get from one person, but rather what this person want to pay you)


That doesn't sound like a problem to me...


So? That's like saying they can't enforce how many people read a book once they sell it to someone.

Of course they can enforce this with digital books, but they shouldn't be able to, and people should protest against it.


Multiple people can't read a book simultaneously; would be consecutively or time sharing which isn't social. Theatres enforce a payment per customer per view and is thus obviously favoured by the movie industry. Books have no equivalent. You're comparing apples and oranges.


"If Hollywood wants to make MORE money. Let me watch NEW movies at home."

Is there even a point to watching new movies? Hollywood is not all that creative these days. The same plot plays out over and over; they are remaking movies that are less than a decade old; actions scenes are formulaic, sex scenes are formulaic, and the way in which scenes are composed is formulaic. When movie studios run out of ideas about what to copy, they just create formulaic sequels to movies that were OK the first time around (Fast Five? Really?).

Hollywood's problem is quality. They spend enormous amounts of money on improved special effects, when special effects are not really what needed to be improved. If you can predict how the story ends (or count the number of possible endings on your fingers), the movie probably isn't worth paying for.


> If you can predict how the story ends (or count the number of possible endings on your fingers), the movie probably isn't worth paying for.

How on earth can you say this? New tellings of old stories are a — the — foundational element of human storytelling since the dawn of time.

Can you give an example of a story whose ending can't be reduced to a few possibilities given the beginning? That doesn't make people shout "What a tweest!"?


I think you are right, but I'm still going to give you Pulp Fiction as an example.


Really? From the first scene, is it so hard to predict "One of the diners has a gun, but will let the robbers go?"

But seriously, I see what you're saying: Pulp Fiction has a multilayered narrative that is complex and consistently surprising. And I think it's a good one to highlight my point that it's the journey, not the destination, and that "can you predict the ending" is a silly classifier.


Agreed. I stick to the foreign movies section of netflix these days. Hollywood movies have gotten to be utter garbage. I think maybe I go to the movies once a year.


3) No blurry screens

4) No crappy audio

These are the most important and frustrating points for me. What's the point of paying to use a professional set-up if it all goes to hell in a handbasket the minute the switch is flipped?

I've sat in a cinema where the volume was so low, the audience could hardly hear a thing. A few shouts of "Turn it up!" went unanswered, and there wasn't an usher anywhere in sight.

At the end, no-one went and complained. I'm just as guilty (my excuse: crushing social anxiety when it comes to complaining in a foreign language) for not doing so, but maybe this is why: not enough people complain/stop going/ask for refunds, and so the circus continues.


Ask for a refund.

I've bailed on films where half the screen was out of focus or, inexplicably, they were using the wrong lens and everything was crunched. Sometimes all you have to do is point it out and they'll fix it, other times they'll refund it no questions asked.

If they don't feel it financially, they won't care to fix it.


Ask for a refund.

Sometimes all you have to do is point it out and they'll fix it

As I hinted, I would have done so at the time if I'd had the language skills to confidently say what was wrong (and understand their suggested resollution). (and if I'd been able to find an usher as well, for that matter).


so...you went to one theater in a foreign country and couldn't complain about it and now all movies in all theaters have terrible quality?

I see a new movie at least once/month and have had little issues with the audio or the screen.


so...you went to one theater in a foreign country and couldn't complain about it and now all movies in all theaters have terrible quality

Nope - I go to many theatres here in Poland. Now I'm fine with complaining where necessary, but at the time my Polish wasn't up to it. The point I wanted - and failed - to illustrate was more that no-one complains, and so the cinemas get away with it far more often than they should.


Movie theaters are extremely expensive setups (proprietary digital projectors, playback/DRM systems, licensing) usually operating at cost - profit comes from those $10 popcorn bags.

Along with digital projection (not much work to do), that means there might be one or two operators for a dozen screens. The projection room also has noise blocking, so no one is listening or looking when you shout. It's more likely that the ticket/security crew outside the door listens and calls the operators, but you have to shout really loud :)


> I've sat in a cinema where the volume was so low

I've sat in a cinema where the volume was so high the audio setup was saturating unless that was a quiet, whispery scene. The film was really good, so we stayed. Although silent, I took action: it was the last time I went to a theatre since three years.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: