Yeah, Reagan did some good things. He also created the atmosphere in which presidents are judged more by clever quips than by experience and plans, he turned the US political scene into a scene of nonstop drama, and there was that Contra thingie that he outright lied about.
Carter wasn't good in office, but after leaving he did incredible things. And he always, always, took what he did seriously.
It would be a good thing. Whether or not it's achievable is entirely a different matter but if that genie could be put back in the bottle it'd be a wonderful thing.
I dislike superficial things such as that. The whole smooth talking and celebrity thing is not for me. But in all fairness, the president that is the most like that is Barrack Obama.
One thing that was good about Bush was that he was not very charismatic. This allowed people to judge him by his actions (and no cult of celebrity existed around him).
The cult of personality that you build around a lot of politicians (esp. Obama) will be bad for you in the long run.
> and there was that Contra thingie that he outright lied about
Here is a quote from WP:
> While President Ronald Reagan was a supporter of the Contra cause,[4] there has not been any evidence uncovered showing that he authorized this plan.
I would not be surprised if he did not know what was happening. The CIA did a lot of things that would fall into a “morally grey area” during the cold war. A lot of these things needed to be done.
> Carter wasn't good in office, but after leaving he did incredible things.
Admittedly he did better than Al Gore, but what did he really accomplish? His habitat for Humanity project is for me stupid.
Why would you get foreign volunteers to build a house in a country with high unemployment? The economic effects was not thought through well – it would disadvantage labourers in the country.
Carter wasn't good in office, but after leaving he did incredible things. And he always, always, took what he did seriously.