Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd say it goes deeper than that, touching on the meaning of marriage. The speaker was put in the position where he had to choose between his spouse and a talk. He chose his wife, in accordance with his marriage vows. I can't see that it is sexist, as the logic doesn't change if the gender of any party is changed.


> The speaker was put in the position where he had to choose between his spouse and a talk.

My simple objection is that he could have had booth.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: