Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Parallelizability isnt always possible, but you should normalize the speed you get per dollar.

    287 MB/sec / $5  ~ 57 MB/sec/dollar 
    816 MB/sec / $20 ~ 40 MB/sec/dollar


    287 MB/sec / $20 ~ 14 MB/sec/dollar
I don't think MB/sec/dollar makes sense simply because disk speed does not scale. If you need a (very) fast disk, Linode is obviously the better choice.


That's only when comparing $5 to $20. Does the $20 DO model also have 287MB/s?


If the difference matters, a $5 DO node likely isn't cutting it.


Thats not the issue. The issue is if (and only if) you have a perfectly parallelizable task, you would be better off getting 4 x $5 DO servers with a rate of (4 x 287) 1148 MB/sec which is much better than 816 MB/sec for the same price. Or you could even get 3 $5 servers and have a rate of (3 x 287) 861 MB/sec which is still better and also cheaper.


It's not like the $20 DO instance is going to be faster




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: