>I want to cyber my girlfriend (who lives 20 miles away) without having NSA agents fapping to it, can I use this for it?
>ofc, man. thou we require your girlfriend to deliver tits or gtfo. (sorry but it's needed to help us on the datamining of frequencies usage and transmission mode performance raw data through our Hadoop cluster of ARM servers, all those pix will be used for the datalink test.. err...derp)
edit: maybe sexist is the wrong word? But for a project that wants "to build up our sense of community and stand up for our future and rights" the tone of the entire readme is overly sexualised and just unnecessary.
Honestly I am mostly just shocked that at no point was there an ASCII hello.jpg
The code, the readme, and all the other bits are in standard "lulzsec" tone. There is no dissemblance to feign respect for your sensibilities, they don't care. At least they're honest.
Topiary aka Jake Davis from Lulzsec had funnier and more tasteful writing than this. HN back in their defacement days always commented on the quality of the writing. This sounds a bit wannabe, which is a shame since 4chan tends to be obsessed with not rehashing tired content.
What is sexist about that? It seems just sexual to me. Someone who is sexually interested in women talking in a funny offensive way about how they want to see breasts.
>ofc, man. thou we require your girlfriend to deliver tits or gtfo. (sorry but it's needed to help us on the datamining of frequencies usage and transmission mode performance raw data through our Hadoop cluster of ARM servers, all those pix will be used for the datalink test.. err...derp)
This is sexist filth.