You seem completely ignorant of the things you're attempting to talk about. Scala doesn't have "hundreds' of features, nor is the language specification thousands of pages. It's just an outright fabrication to say so.
>Go was created by the forefathers of C and Unix.
Yeah, and it's obvious (and sad) they ignored the last twenty years of PL research and progress.
>They left out all of those features on purpose
Did they? I don't believe this is the case, as I've heard from the creators many times that they want to add generics but haven't figured out the details yet.
Are you really going to sit here and argue that static typing is important EXCEPT for when working with collection? That parametric polymorphism doesn't make things simpler?
>Go was created by the forefathers of C and Unix.
Yeah, and it's obvious (and sad) they ignored the last twenty years of PL research and progress.
>They left out all of those features on purpose
Did they? I don't believe this is the case, as I've heard from the creators many times that they want to add generics but haven't figured out the details yet.
Are you really going to sit here and argue that static typing is important EXCEPT for when working with collection? That parametric polymorphism doesn't make things simpler?