> Ok, how much do you wanna bet than in less than 6 months there is going to be a war?
Be foolish to bet against that, since the US has never stopped being at war with North Korea since the 1950s.
> (probably giving the weapons to south Korea so the put the body count)
Given the pre-targeted artillery pointed at their capital, neither the people nor the government of South Korea are likely to get behind resuming active conflict with the North without some somewhat more substantial provocation than the SPE hack.
And US encouragement -- if it were to be offered -- is unlikely to change that.
>Be foolish to bet against that, since the US has never stopped being at war with North Korea since the 1950s.
They are not trying to hard right, I mean they trhowed down Saddam Hussain in a couple of years, but somehow they are unable to take North Korea despite fighting for more than 50 years (based on your claim), yeah... no.
Be foolish to bet against that, since the US has never stopped being at war with North Korea since the 1950s.
> (probably giving the weapons to south Korea so the put the body count)
Given the pre-targeted artillery pointed at their capital, neither the people nor the government of South Korea are likely to get behind resuming active conflict with the North without some somewhat more substantial provocation than the SPE hack.
And US encouragement -- if it were to be offered -- is unlikely to change that.