Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chilipepperhott's commentslogin

I believe this is also known as a Dutch auction. They don't know the true value of their product, so they price it high and will slowly bring it down until they are satisfied with demand.

I don't believe that is their point.


It's not their point as stated in the description, but it is the point inferred from the title alone. "How much of Hacker News is about AI?" would have been better.


I think that this would be easy to criticize without interfacing with their underlying idea here.

It's cool that with a tool like this you don't NEED to get all aspects of your code finalized and ready. It's possible to be vague when you want to and specific when you need to.

I'm not sure if that itself would work well in practice, but the project is still quite cool nonetheless.


I absolutely agree. I don't feel that I have sufficient evidence that they even really care about these reliability problems.


Not to mention AWS?


They actually _did_ hit zero nines of availability a few months ago.


Plurality should have been the operative word.


What I want:

A self hosted version of GitHub that is a precise mirror of an actual GitHub repository. That is, PRs from GitHub appear on the selfhosted instance and my reviews from the self hosted instance appear on GitHub. That way I can work on my private instance when GitHub is down (or slow) and I can be assured my work still appears to everyone online.

Does this exist?


AFAIK there is nothing like this out there, because there is not one standard for a "pull reauest" in the sense of how a web based forge does it. and it gets complicated quickly due to complexity of git and forks.

the closest thing i've found are tooks like https://github.com/raylabshq/gitea-mirror


Git gets you 90% of the way there. Sounds like you just want a decentralized review solution to go with it.


It's difficult to ignore how the README is filled with Claudisms.


Looks like PRs are actively accepted. I just got rid of one of them! https://github.com/vercel-labs/scriptc/commit/c4b68dc6d9c259...


This is like putting lipstick on a pig. Give me an AI written README or tests but actually thoughtful codebase over human written readme but aislop code any day of the month


Perhaps they should be left as a warning to others.


I think you're absolutely right. I also think that trying to become a better person is an important part of living a full life. The work I put in during the hours I'm being paid are a part that life.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: