Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I used to think there were only two as well but a third kept popping up. It might not be a strict interpretation per se, but it deserves its own category.

It goes something like "You shouldn't say stuff like that, its prejudice against the poor, don't be so arrogant, hateful, etc." The quote is a call to action: We should help the poor make better choices; we should help the poor have better choices; and the third "we should make it so people don't talk like this". I find the last one the most troubling.

Personally I think both sides should soften their approaches and try to meet in the middle of #1 and #2 for surely its a continuum stretching between the two. The third reaction baffles me.



I don't understand how that maps to the original statement. Can you go word by word or something?

Unless I'm missing something it sounds like a reaction and not at all an interpretation.


I guess it would qualify more as a figurative interpretation. Its probably subconsciously choosing #1 or #2 then (no matter the choice) hearing the opposing view in the quote, and then immediately interpreting it as a mean spirited attack on your position. Its an almost reflexive jump to being offended that happens often enough that I've given it its own category.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: